Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?
Experimentation on
animals
paved the way for the safer administration of vaccines
to humans
. Others view this
as an inhumane act and should be banned from practice. However
, others still support this
because of its milestone achievements in scientific development. In this
essay, I will explain why the perceived unethical practice of animals
should be continued and why there are no other alternatives.
Important discoveries have been made from successful experiments with pharmaceutical vaccines
on vertebrates. Animals
, for instance
, were used for these 'trial and error' of developed vaccines
specifically, rabbits and monkeys. Although
the probability of these vertebrates surviving this
project is inevitable, scientists still resort to this
only way of testing their developed vaccines
. Historically, an outbreak of killer German measles was only prevented when a vaccine was created, which paved the way for continued immunization in several communities to end this
virus.
Those who disapprove of the practices on animals
have no better solution for the possible alternatives. Some argue that this
should be an illegal act because the procedure is no different than killing living creatures with no consent. However
, I don't believe that clinical procedures are any different, for instance
, rabbits were used for these trials than the risk of performing it on humans
because of the uncertainties of these methods, which have helped reduce casualties in mankind. At the moment, there are no other alternatives that scientists can test out their created vaccines
. Indeed, these are living creatures with feelings but our attempt to save humanity will always be greater.
In conclusion, these practices are considered reliable and safer ways of testing newly developed discoveries such
as vaccines
which only sole purpose is to immunize the population globally. However
, others may argue that it is unethical to subject animals
to these methods of trials because they are still living creatures just like humans
who have emotions, I do believe that in our current situation, we wouldn't risk humans
over animals
for the 'trial and error' methods.Submitted by jancris81 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Provide a more balanced view by mentioning alternative methods to animal testing, such as in vitro testing or computer modeling.
task achievement
Clarify some arguments, especially related to ethical concerns and why alternatives are currently insufficient.
coherence cohesion
Use linking words and phrases more frequently to clearly connect your ideas and paragraphs, improving logical flow.
task achievement
The essay provides specific examples, like the use of rabbits and monkeys, and historical context with the German measles vaccine.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clear, stating your stance and summarizing the main arguments effectively.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?