Some people say that increasing business and cultural contacts between countries is a positive development, while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your own.

In the salad days of the millennium,
this
Linking Words
society is polarised into two groups almost equally regarding the notion, either the trend of cultural and business contracts between different communities is a positive development , or it may cause society to lose its natural appearance. The subsequent paragraphs would shed light on both approaches before making a final note. On the one hand, those who support closer international connections provide a multitude of reasons to justify their view. One of the most obvious benefits is that increased cooperation can strengthen national economies. To illustrate, nations that trade with each other can access wider markets and attract foreign investment.
For instance
Linking Words
, the trading of food and electronic gadgets between the USA and India escalates the coverage of foreign markets in local countries.
In addition
Linking Words
, cultural exchange promotes mutual understanding and tolerance. People who are exposed to different traditions, food and customs may become more open-minded and respectful of other cultures.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, those who are concerned about the loss of natural identity
also
Linking Words
have some points that should not be overlooked. One major reason is that global culture can dominate local traditions. To clarify, international brands, western media and popular culture can replace traditional clothing, languages, or customs. To exemplify, young people in many countries prefer foreign music and fashion rather than their own cultural heritage.
As a result
Linking Words
, unique traditions could gradually disappear. To recapitulate, it is evident that some support international contracts because they promote economic growth and cultural understanding,
while
Linking Words
others fear they threaten national identity. Having considered both sides thoroughly, I have personally come to believe that increasing global interaction is a positive phenomenon, as long as governments and communities actively promote their own cultural heritage.
Moreover
Linking Words
, a balanced approach can allow countries to benefit from globalisation without losing their unique identities.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task response
Fix the opening. Make a simple line that states your view at once.
Coherence
Make one clear idea in each paragraph and show how it links to your view.
Style/Language
Use short, plain sentences. Cut long phrases and hard words.
Task response
Give easy, clear examples that show why your view is right.
Content
The essay uses both sides and gives a view.
Content
You use a clear example of trade and culture.
Structure
The text is easy to read and has clear parts.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • country
  • culture
  • business
  • trade
  • contact
  • positive
  • negative
  • identity
  • nation
  • people
  • language
  • tradition
  • festival
  • music
  • food
  • craft
  • brand
  • global
  • local
  • open
  • protect
  • preserve
  • develop
  • learn
  • exchange
  • policy
  • education
  • balance
  • heritage
  • custom
  • society
  • economy
  • jobs
  • travel
  • communication
What to do next:
Look at other essays: