Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than in building a larger collection of paper books. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Try for free →
In recent years, rapid technological advancements have sparked an ongoing debate as to whether libraries should prioritise digital
resources
Use synonyms
or preserve conventional reading
materials
Use synonyms
.
Although
Linking Words
proponents of paper-based
materials
Use synonyms
are concerned about serious health issues associated with digital devices , I totally disagree with
this
Linking Words
viewpoint, as I firmly believe that digital
resources
Use synonyms
offer greater convenience, more efficient
time
Use synonyms
management, and can significantly reduce environmental damage. One of the most compelling arguments in
favor
Change the spelling
favour
show examples
of digital
resources
Use synonyms
is that
this
Linking Words
approach allows readers to save a significant amount of
time
Use synonyms
that would
otherwise
Linking Words
be spent travelling to a physical library. By investing in technological
resources
Use synonyms
such
Linking Words
as online libraries, institutions can considerably reduce visitor pressure and prolonged waiting times.
For example
Linking Words
, university students who usually have tight deadlines can save more
time
Use synonyms
to focus on more urgent tasks by having access to digital
materials
Use synonyms
.
Therefore
Linking Words
, it is evident that improving technological
resources
Use synonyms
enables people to access reading
materials
Use synonyms
regardless of location and
time
Use synonyms
.
In addition
Linking Words
, expanding digital
resources
Use synonyms
can drastically reduce environmental damage. Unlike traditional paper-based
books
Use synonyms
, digital
materials
Use synonyms
do not require paper production, thereby helping to reduce deforestation and conserve natural
resources
Use synonyms
.
For example
Linking Words
, Google
Books
Use synonyms
operates on cloud-based platforms, eliminating the need for conventional printing.
As a result
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
approach helps countries not only conserve the environment but
also
Linking Words
provide cost-effective alternatives to paper-based
books
Use synonyms
.
Thus
Linking Words
, investing in digital
resources
Use synonyms
plays an essential role in addressing pressing environmental problems associated with deforestation, thereby enabling governments to protect local biodiversity. Admittedly, paper-based
books
Use synonyms
offer several benefits.
Firstly
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
approach can significantly reduce screen
time
Use synonyms
, thereby preventing eye-related problems.
This
Linking Words
is particularly important for senior citizens, who often suffer from poor vision.
Moreover
Linking Words
, paper-based
books
Use synonyms
can foster a sense of discipline, as readers usually have a limited
time
Use synonyms
to consume the information.
As a result
Linking Words
, individuals are more likely to manage their
time
Use synonyms
effectively and engage more deeply with the content. . In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
traditional
books
Use synonyms
have some advantages, the benefits of digital
resources
Use synonyms
far outweigh these drawbacks. By offering unparalleled accessibility, enhancing
time
Use synonyms
efficiency, and significantly reducing environmental harm, digital
materials
Use synonyms
should be prioritised by modern libraries.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Task response: Your view is clear from the start, and you answer the question well. To get a higher score, explain the other side a bit more and then show more strongly why your side is better.
task response
Task response: Your main ideas are strong, but some examples are a bit general. Add one more real and clear example to make your points feel more fully developed.
coherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesion: Your essay is easy to follow and has a clear paragraph plan. To improve, check small punctuation problems, like the extra full stop before the conclusion.
coherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesion: You use linking words well, but some parts sound a little repeated, such as repeating ideas about time and environment. Try to vary your support and avoid saying the same point in a similar way.
task response
Task response: You give a clear answer to the question and keep the same position all through the essay.
task response
Task response: Your ideas are relevant and well chosen, especially on access, time, and harm to nature.
coherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesion: The essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, so the reader can follow it easily.
coherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesion: Most paragraphs stay on one main idea, and your linking words help connect the points well.
Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example
What to do next:
Look at other essays: