Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations should allow higher numbers of refugees and provide them with adequate humanitarian aid.

This

Linking Words

essay agrees with

this

Linking Words

statement because richer nations have ample resources and infrastructure to support

this

Linking Words

cause.

To begin

Linking Words

with, wealthy nations have

abundant

Suggestion

an abundant food supply

food

Use synonyms

supply to support their citizens.

However

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

excessive supply has

also

Linking Words

led to massive amounts of

food

Use synonyms

wastage.

Instead

Linking Words

of wasting these resources, governments of wealthy countries could allocate some of these supplies to people in dire need of help.

For example

Linking Words

, during the holy month of Ramadan, some rich Arab nations prepare huge banquets for their citizens where 30% of the

food

Use synonyms

is wasted in decorations and later thrown away. Another important point to consider is that rich countries have well developed housing and infrastructure facilities.

In other words

Linking Words

, these nations are more than capable of handling an inflow of immigrants without reducing their quality of life. Allocating a small section of land to these helpless beings would be a sensible and humane gesture.

For example

Linking Words

, only a

third

Linking Words

of land in Australia is populated, with the vast majority of its mainland uninhabited.

This

Linking Words

means that it has enough land to accommodate additional immigrants without disrupting its economy. In conclusion, it is evident that countries with a strong economy can accept more refugees, and are more than capable of providing them with

food

Use synonyms

and shelter. Regardless, it is a moral responsibility of every human being to support each other in times of need.