Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often a debated topic that the government should spend revenue on constructing new structures

such

as museums or town forums rather than restoring the existing monuments.

Although

I agree that it is essential to protect constructions from the past, I

also

do not think spending on public buildings is a waste of

money

. There are several reasons for spending a significant amount of budget on the restoration of historical buildings.

First

and foremost, they stand as a sentinel of time representing the worth of our ancestors.

For example

, pyramids of Eygpt are piles of mystery yet to be solved. Every time they explain something related to it, they are discovering unique attributes of our history. Every remain

of

Suggestion

on

them at present often represents our cultural heritage.

Secondly

, they can generate income as tourist sights as well as creating jobs. So many survey statistics have already proven it.

However

, it does not mean that the construction of new buildings should be neglected.

To begin

, it is not possible to protect all historical buildings, some of them are

unrepairable

not capable of being separated

inseparable

and so should be demolished, so a better architecture can be built.

Moreover

, maintenance of new buildings is a lot easier when compared to their counterparts. On the long term, the government can solve a lot of

money

which can be used for the better good. To sum up, there are clear benefits of ensuring a large amount of investment into these old buildings as they will influence our present generation. That said, I do not believe spending

money

on new edifices is a waste of

money

as

this

provides essential benefits as well.