Space
exploration has remained one of the greatest achievements of mankind. The notion that
space
missions should be reduced, because there are more dilemmas on our planet that need urgent attention, is becoming increasingly popular. In my opinion, I totally agree that the exploration of
space
should take a back seat and the funds poured into it should be used for the development and
sustainabiltythe property of being sustainable
of the earth.
First
and foremost, there is no doubt that
space
projects are a huge investment, but sadly they do not generate revenue, neither do they impact human lives. They only satisfy the curiosity of man to know and experience the galaxies around him. There are capital intensive projects that can use these funds
instead
, which in the long run will benefit most of humanity,
such
as
poverythe state of having little or no money and few or no material possessions
eradication and provision of portable drinking water.
Furthermore
. These resources can be
chanelleda path over which electrical signals can pass
into helping resource- poor countries.
For example
, NASA
published in 2019, that it spent about 15 billion US dollars on
space
projects in the past year alone.
On the other hand
, the Cleveland clinic,
also
published in 2019, that it would need about 5 billion dollars to provide free medical care to all Americans in 2019.
This
shows that the money spent on trips to
space
can be used to better the day to day lives of people,
hence
it should be curbed.
Secondly
, a lot of resources are out
these missions. Apart from the technology and infrastructure, there is
also
the issue of manpower
such
as engineers
amdin order to; used instead of "to", especially after try, come, go
doctors. These people who are most likely to be at the top of their respective fields, are recruited for these projects, shifting their attention away from more significant issues affecting mankind.
In addition
, it leaves room for gaps in learning and innovation in those fields.
For instance
, the Harvard Research Institute, released a
carried out in 2018, which showed that 70% of its scientists
newbe cognizant or aware of a fact or a specific piece of information; possess knowledge or information about
one or two people that could give them headway in their current research works but are currently doing
space
activities.
In conclusion, the topic of whether or not missions to
should be reduced due to high cost remains controversial. I strongly agree with the school of though that these activities should be restricted and the funds
chanelleda path over which electrical signals can pass
to solve the major obstacles the planet is currently facing like poverty and food shortages.