It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

As technology has developed,
people
can now travel to remote natural
areas
.
While
this
trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant. On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits.
Firstly
,
this
is a newer and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries has been too common for most
people
, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places
such
as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest.
This
gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories.
Secondly
, when visiting remote
areas
,
people
, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat.
For example
, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans.
On the other hand
, I believe
this
development has far more drawbacks. The first one is that travelling to remote natural
areas
can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared.
For instance
, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects
people
's health. Travelling to forests can
also
be dangerous as
people
have to face the risk of being attacked by animals.
Also
, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high.
Therefore
, it seems like only scientists and rich
people
can afford
this
activity, so
this
development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals. In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of
people
being able to travel to remote
areas
outweigh its advantages.
Submitted by vbwielts on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Structure your answers in logical paragraphs

The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format.

A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences).

Stick to this essay structure:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS

Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • remote natural environment
  • scientific research
  • climate change
  • environmental preservation
  • economic benefits
  • conservation efforts
  • habitat disruption
  • pollution
  • cultural disruption
  • indigenous populations
  • commercialization
  • safety risks
  • personal enrichment
  • ecosystems
  • awareness
  • appreciation for nature
What to do next:
Look at other essays:

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!