With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that untouched areas of the Earth should be exploited in order to obtain more

energy

resources due to the rise of the world's need for oil and gas.

This

essay is going to disagree with

this

statement and present two reasons why we cannot continue digging natural elements of our planet. Despite the expansion of manufacturing industries in developing countries represents growth in their economy and

also

the demand in fossil fuel, they should be avoided because they are extremely polluting when extracted to be burned for

energy

production.

For example

, the increasing numbers of cars in a city using oil or gas to move means the rise of carbon dioxide emissions.

As a result

, the poor quality of the air in that city would affect the population health while

this

would

also

stress global warming effects.

Furthermore

, it is not clever to rely on non renewable resources to develop economies since these virgin materials have limited availability and can become scarce.

For instance

, governments should subsidise the development of renewable

energy

such

as solar panels, wind farms and electric engines for cars. By doing

this

, we would make sure we have enough resources to keep growing the economy of our countries without depending on finite raw materials. To conclude, I totally disagree that we need to discover new fossil fuel sources to continue promoting the development of nations. In my opinion, we should use clean and sustainable

energy

resources that could be reused infinite times.