Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

A newborn

child

is easily affected by diseases as soon as they leave their mother’s womb. Government hospitals provide a course of

vaccination

, in different stages of childhood, to prevent diseases. Most of the vaccinations are given because, the

child

’s immune system cannot fight against

such

dioceses. Once a

disease

is notified, it has the probability of spreading throughout the area where it was identified

initially

.

Therefore

, a

disease

in a

child

, will affect the

child

as well as anyone who interact. Immunizing children should be an onus of a

parent

, followed without hesitating.

Consequently

, immunizing their own

child

subsequently

, prevent the

disease

from spreading. Individuals having the right to choose the procedure of immunizing a

child

will have an adverse impact. A

parent

can be in various standards in the society. Whilst some may not know the significance of

vaccination

. If

such

parent

come across a decision, to not immune their

child

at any circumstance, it’s a risk for the people living in that area.

Furthermore

, if a death is reported regarding a situation alike, the government is responsible for it, for not intending to prevent the c

ause

an occurrence of something

case

beforehand. By instituting a law to immune children, every

parent

bound to follow it regardless of their standard. And once the law is active, a death reported due to a

disease

without

vaccination

, will be a cause to charge a penalty or take actions against that

parent

.

Therefore

, in my aspect I believe instituting a law for

vaccination

is more convenient.