Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is a nasty fact that people believe that the animals would not have any place to live in the
next
century and so, these days do not consider saving
wild
all living things (except people) that are undomesticated
wildlife
life
as their utmost priority. I vary with the statement and would want to explain that saving
wild
all living things (except people) that are undomesticated
wildlife
life
would be beneficial
for
Suggestion
to
our
survivial
a state of surviving; remaining alive
survival
. Animals are important to our own existence, they are the one who
maintain
Suggestion
maintains
the food chain and keep it intact.
For example
, frogs are
essential source
Suggestion
an essential source
the essential source
essential sources
of the chain if they are
extinct
Accept comma addition
extinct, then
then
there would be a distract increase in mosquitoes, which can cause harm to humans.
Thus
, Animals are very much needed in our
life
and we need to ensure their protection as our prime responsibility.
Furthermore
, the World is their home
also, we are
Suggestion
, we are also
sharing our
spaces
Suggestion
space
with them, we have got no right to infringe their boundaries and leave them no space to survive.
On the contrary
, being a superior
species it
Accept comma addition
species, it
becomes our
accountablity
responsibility to someone or for some activity
accountability
to make
this
World a better livable place for all the breathing things.
Therefore
, it becomes are main
responsiblity
the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force
responsibility
to protect these animals. In conclusion, Earth is a shared place, it is not ours not theirs.
Eventhough
Suggestion
Even though
we may not consider
wild
all living things (except people) that are undomesticated
wildlife
life
to be important and worth protecting, we still sure know that they are necessary for our lives,
hence
, I
completly
to a complete degree or to the full or entire extent
completely
disagree with the fact that protecting
wild
all living things (except people) that are undomesticated
wildlife
life
is a waste of time.
Submitted by write2navleen on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: