Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Implementing proper transport facilities to provide the nation is a challenge for any government. Whether a vast rail network or an improved road transport system can better facilitate the transportation of goods and commuters is a never-ending debate. I believe that fast rails are the conveyance of the future because administrators should spend money on building and developing rail networks.
On one hand, trains are faster and can carry a large number of passengers and goods at a time. When thousands of cars carry office-goers and students each day in a city, only a few shuttle trains can do the same. Traffic congestion kills millions of work hours per years and costs billions of dollars and it is caused basically by the sheer number of road transports we use every day. According to a report published by the Road Transport Authority in Pakistan, traffic congestion in Karachi city eats up 3.2 million working hours per day. A vast network of railways is the only alternative to curb the loss.
Expanding roads in cities are almost impossible as they must interconnect the existing lanes. Locomotives, primarily use railroads built aside the cities and consume less space. Effectively managed train system does not cause congestion and save time. By considering the transportation of the future, its developed nation subsidies heavily in developing their transport facilities and they invest more in expanding their rail lines.
My opinion is government should plan for the future, considering the facilities and impact on the environment, while investing in infrastructure development. As locomotives offer more conveniences than road transports do, it deserves more budget.
shahzadkhurram1985
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction
Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate about whether parents should face penalties when their kids violate the law, as they are deemed responsible for their actions. I wholeheartedly support this perspective.
A substantial number of individuals presume that in the environment, a lot of diverse animals and plants are going to be destroyed. However, recent research has shown that climate change is the most important cause of climate change, and a superior strategy against the situation is for governments to make new laws to protect the world's ecosystem. Therefore, the cases and effects of these on this approach, as well as possible solutions, are outlined below.
An enormous amount of the population wants to celebrate vacations in their home country rather than overseas. This essay will argue why local tourism is convenient. I endorse this idea, It is not only affordable but also provides ease of communication.
Currently, there is a conspicuous trend wherein the prevalence of marketing globally sourced food products within supermarkets surpasses that of domestic counterparts. This essay explores how the merits, including culinary diversity and extended availability, supersede the drawbacks involving environmental concerns and potential impacts on indigenous economies.