Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Many people claim that

art

is not an essential subject and spending money on

art

is not useful, and it should be directed elsewhere. My own view on the matter is governmental grants should be spent in a more important area, while

art

as a powerful form of communication should be noticed. Many support the view that some social services

such

as education,

health

care, and transportation system are more important for people's welfare. Personally speaking, there is no denying that

health

is a significant issue in every society, and it is linked to the good structures for healthcare

such

as hospitals. It is essential that foremost governmental donation should be spent on the healthcare system

such

as build the hospitals or equipped them.

On the other hand

,

art

is worth every penny

that is

spent on them.

Art

is linked to the culture and history of countries, and the

government

is liable to maintain the

art

to retain the cultures.

For instance

, most countries

such

as, the US, UK, Australia, and Canada maintain

art

in the form of a museum. Many people visit the museum for free, and the cost of retain of the museum is undertaken by the

government

. In my opinion, it is necessary for

government

Suggestion

the government

to notice the

art

as an

influent

a power to affect persons or events especially power based on prestige etc

influence

subject through the people. In conclusion, it is crucial that

government

attention to vital subjects

such

as

health

and

government

funding should be mainly spent on

health

,

furthermore

,

art

as an essential part of every

countries

Suggestion

country's

countries'

culture should be noticed by

government

Suggestion

the government

.