Some people think that to produce a happier society is to ensure that there is only a small difference on the earnings of the richest and the poorest members. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are people who believe that a happier nation is evaluated by a short gap of the income between the richest and the poorest people, but I do not agree with

this

point of view. I think that there are other factors contribute to the level of happiness of a society.

To begin

with, people would be happier if their needs met, especially in health care, education, infrastructure, and entertainment.

Such

essential needs are provided by the government, thereby the authority should be the one manages and has a fair system to use the income taxes received equally. Taxes,

on the other hand

, are contributed by the rich and the poor people,

therefore

a good tax system would help to reduce the gap and would make the community happier.

For example

, the wealthiest people would pay higher tax and the least poverty classes pay less amount. And, the government should use that money to pay back for the benefits of the whole nation by giving free access to healthcare, education or entertainment.

On the other hand

, shortening the gap of the income between the rich and the poor is not a good strategy because it could not make the world strive for a better.

Firstly

, if everyone gets the same amount of what they work for, no one wants to work harder and thinks differently.

As a result

, the country could not develop well because everyone has the same standards.

Besides

, people become lazier and more laid-back and that would not make people happier. In conclusion, I think the government plays a vital role in controlling the public money and helps society become happier by enhancing local tangibles, not by cutting the salaries between the richest and the poorest.