Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree.

Nowadays, the natural disaster is a common event that

happen

Suggestion

happens

every

years

Suggestion

year

in various areas. Even so, there are a different between rich and poor nations about the damage control and damage absorbing capability. It

can be agree

Suggestion

can agree

can be agreed

that the resourceful states are better at dealing with the natural hazard and they should provide a support to the incapable. Exploring the benefits and loss from assisting

these event

Suggestion

this event

these events

will prove

this

.

First

of all, if the rich countries help these poverty states, they could have expanded their political influence.

For example

, the American

economic

Suggestion

economy

that infamous about being heavily relied on global influence needs many supports in international and

trade

pacts for their nation to continue flourishing.

Nevertheless

, the disaster

assist

Suggestion

assists

in poorer states require these rich nations to spend a considerable amount of money in various

form

Suggestion

forms

,

such

a low interest loan or an exclusive low tax exempt

trade

deal. Despite the American monetary loss, it could gain the return in

form

Suggestion

the form

of a full cooperation from that country, many long term

trade

pacts, a better global image, and a higher status in hegemony circle. By

this

I

means

Suggestion

mean

, the poverty countries will be in debt and have to return the

favor

promote over another

favour

in various forms.

Furthermore

, it is better for the strong countries to solve the Earth calamity before it spreading to global level.

For instance

, disease like COV19, which keep spreading to many countries, affect the

economic

Suggestion

economy

and people life in international level, as a consequence, the world is going to experience a significant economic recession.

the

Suggestion

The

wealthy

countries

Accept comma addition

countries, therefore

therefore

were inevitable to include in

this

post-calamity affect.

on

Suggestion

On

the contrary, if these

powerfull

having great power or force or potency or effect

powerful

nations do assist these

countries

Suggestion

countries'

country's

problem

Suggestion

problems

from the

begining

the event consisting of the start of something

beginning

with their professional staffs and high technology support, it might change the spreading flow or absorb the disease's damage in the area before it develop to the global economic recession and

finally

affect to them.

Hence

, the effort might risk their staffs' life and could experience a backlash if the mission was fail. Even so, if these strong states would

taken

Suggestion

take

a lead, they might have

leave

Suggestion

left

a good impression afterward, which could improve to an economic alliance or a new

trade

pact and

also

benefit from using these nations as an offshore defence line. In conclusion, it is better for everyone if the calamity were

stop

Suggestion

stopped

with some benefit to both rich and poor

contries

a politically organized body of people under a single government

countries

in the post-disaster. I

also

believe that the strong countries are better at dealing with the natural disaster and they should provide a support to the weak. If every country could follow

this

idea, the world will has less problem.