Nowadays, the natural disaster is a common event that
in various areas. Even so, there are a different between rich and poor nations about the damage control and damage absorbing capability. It
that the resourceful states are better at dealing with the natural hazard and they should provide a support to the incapable. Exploring the benefits and loss from assisting
of all, if the rich countries help these poverty states, they could have expanded their political influence.
, the American
that infamous about being heavily relied on global influence needs many supports in international and
pacts for their nation to continue flourishing.
, the disaster
in poorer states require these rich nations to spend a considerable amount of money in various
a low interest loan or an exclusive low tax exempt
deal. Despite the American monetary loss, it could gain the return in
of a full cooperation from that country, many long term
pacts, a better global image, and a higher status in hegemony circle. By
, the poverty countries will be in debt and have to return the
in various forms.
, it is better for the strong countries to solve the Earth calamity before it spreading to global level.
, disease like COV19, which keep spreading to many countries, affect the
and people life in international level, as a consequence, the world is going to experience a significant economic recession.
were inevitable to include in
the contrary, if these
having great power or force or potency or effect
nations do assist these
the event consisting of the start of something
with their professional staffs and high technology support, it might change the spreading flow or absorb the disease's damage in the area before it develop to the global economic recession and
affect to them.
, the effort might risk their staffs' life and could experience a backlash if the mission was fail. Even so, if these strong states would
a lead, they might have
a good impression afterward, which could improve to an economic alliance or a new
benefit from using these nations as an offshore defence line.
In conclusion, it is better for everyone if the calamity were
with some benefit to both rich and poor
a politically organized body of people under a single government
in the post-disaster. I
believe that the strong countries are better at dealing with the natural disaster and they should provide a support to the weak. If every country could follow
idea, the world will has less problem.