Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree.

Nowadays, the natural disaster is a common event that

Suggestion

happens

happen

every

Suggestion

year

years

in various areas. Even so, there are a different between rich and poor nations about the damage control and damage absorbing capability. It

Suggestion

can agree

can be agreed

can be agree

that the resourceful states are better at dealing with the natural hazard and they should provide a support to the incapable. Exploring the benefits and loss from assisting

Suggestion

this event

these events

these event

will prove

this

.

First

of all, if the rich countries help these poverty states, they could have expanded their political influence.

For example

, the American

Suggestion

economy

economic

that infamous about being heavily relied on global influence needs many supports in international and

trade

pacts for their nation to continue flourishing.

Nevertheless

, the disaster

Suggestion

assists

assist

in poorer states require these rich nations to spend a considerable amount of money in various

Suggestion

forms

form

,

such

a low interest loan or an exclusive low tax exempt

trade

deal. Despite the American monetary loss, it could gain the return in

Suggestion

the form

form

of a full cooperation from that country, many long term

trade

pacts, a better global image, and a higher status in hegemony circle. By

this

I

Suggestion

mean

means

, the poverty countries will be in debt and have to return the

promote over another

favour

favor

in various forms.

Furthermore

, it is better for the strong countries to solve the Earth calamity before it spreading to global level.

For instance

, disease like COV19, which keep spreading to many countries, affect the

Suggestion

economy

economic

and people life in international level, as a consequence, the world is going to experience a significant economic recession.

Suggestion

The

the

wealthy

Accept comma addition

countries, therefore

countries

therefore

were inevitable to include in

this

post-calamity affect.

Suggestion

On

on

the contrary, if these

having great power or force or potency or effect

powerful

powerfull

nations do assist these

Suggestion

countries'

country's

countries

Suggestion

problems

problem

from the

the event consisting of the start of something

beginning

begining

with their professional staffs and high technology support, it might change the spreading flow or absorb the disease's damage in the area before it develop to the global economic recession and

finally

affect to them.

Hence

, the effort might risk their staffs' life and could experience a backlash if the mission was fail. Even so, if these strong states would

Suggestion

take

taken

a lead, they might have

Suggestion

left

leave

a good impression afterward, which could improve to an economic alliance or a new

trade

pact and

also

benefit from using these nations as an offshore defence line. In conclusion, it is better for everyone if the calamity were

Suggestion

stopped

stop

with some benefit to both rich and poor

a politically organized body of people under a single government

countries

contries

in the post-disaster. I

also

believe that the strong countries are better at dealing with the natural disaster and they should provide a support to the weak. If every country could follow

this

idea, the world will has less problem.