Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the natural disaster is a common event that happen every years in various areas. Even so, there are a different between rich and poor nations about the damage control and damage absorbing capability. It can be agree that the resourceful states are better at dealing with the natural hazard and they should provide a support to the incapable. Exploring the benefits and loss from assisting these event will prove economic that infamous about being heavily relied on global influence needs many supports in international and assist in poorer states require these rich nations to spend a considerable amount of money in various form, form of a full cooperation from that country, many long term means, the poverty countries will be in debt and have to return the favor in various forms.
economic and people life in international level, as a consequence, the world is going to experience a significant economic recession. the wealthy countries on the contrary, if these powerfull nations do assist these countries problem from the begining with their professional staffs and high technology support, it might change the spreading flow or absorb the disease's damage in the area before it develop to the global economic recession and taken a lead, they might have leave a good impression afterward, which could improve to an economic alliance or a new stop with some benefit to both rich and poor contries in the post-disaster. I
Suggestion
happens
Suggestion
year
Suggestion
can agree
can be agreed
Suggestion
this event
these events
this
.
First
of all, if the rich countries help these poverty states, they could have expanded their political influence. For example
, the American Suggestion
economy
trade
pacts for their nation to continue flourishing. Nevertheless
, the disaster Suggestion
assists
Suggestion
forms
such
a low interest loan or an exclusive low tax exempt trade
deal. Despite the American monetary loss, it could gain the return in Suggestion
the form
trade
pacts, a better global image, and a higher status in hegemony circle. By this
I Suggestion
mean
promote over another
favour
Furthermore
, it is better for the strong countries to solve the Earth calamity before it spreading to global level. For instance
, disease like COV19, which keep spreading to many countries, affect the Suggestion
economy
Suggestion
The
Accept comma addition
countries, therefore
therefore
were inevitable to include in this
post-calamity affect. Suggestion
On
having great power or force or potency or effect
powerful
Suggestion
countries'
country's
Suggestion
problems
the event consisting of the start of something
beginning
finally
affect to them. Hence
, the effort might risk their staffs' life and could experience a backlash if the mission was fail. Even so, if these strong states would Suggestion
take
Suggestion
left
trade
pact and also
benefit from using these nations as an offshore defence line.
In conclusion, it is better for everyone if the calamity were Suggestion
stopped
a politically organized body of people under a single government
countries
also
believe that the strong countries are better at dealing with the natural disaster and they should provide a support to the weak. If every country could follow this
idea, the world will has less problem.Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.