It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a school of thought that young students should learn about the past of their own agrarian
first
rather than the international past. I completely agree with
this
opinion. The most compelling argument for putting the local past above international one in school is that it would be easier for pupils to learn. They have been unconsciously familiar with and strongly connected to the language and culture of their own provincial during early childhood, which help sets a solid foundation to learn national
history
. Memorizing historical names typify that, in which students would find it easier to remember the terms they can already write down and pronounce more than doing the same with what's coming from other languages. Another more pragmatic reason for prioritizing local past is that it is usually easier to teach. Generally,
history
educators are more knowledgeable about the past of their own country than other civilizations.
In addition
, materials and facilities for teaching local
history
are often more available than for foreign ones.
Therefore
, it would be difficult to reverse the condition to put more weight on the
history
of the world.
Finally
, global
history
should not be learnt by young scholars because of its complexity. Most learners at early ages are not capable of connecting different historical events on the world stage, which could only be accomplished by those who are more grown-up. As many pedagogical studies have suggested, only students from secondary levels should learn main events throughout human
history
related to their country. In conclusion, I absolutely believe that
history
lessons delivered at school should be more about the past of the nation than that of the world.
Submitted by nav2270deep on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: