Scientific Research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In
this
competitive world, if the countries want to develop and grow themselves with the pace of other developed nations, to carry out scientific investigation is of vital importance. Who should control and finance these investigations, Government or private institutions?
This
has become a contentious debate. I contend with legislations taking accountability and controlling scientific-inquiry for the well being of the whole community.
This
essay will discuss both the views and will draw an inference. When scientific-inquiry is monitored and initiated by law making body, its main motive is public interest, as
such
inquiries are made for society and the investment is done by taxes paid off by the common people. Even if the probe is delayed or gets void, the union can take care of that loss.
Moreover
, the security of
such
result is never compromised. To illustrate, analysis related to the defence of any country is undeniably carried completely by their governing bodies of the nations. When private organisations conduct inquiry, their chief concern is protecting their own interests.
This
explains why the exploration conducted by coffee companies or gum companies only highlights the benefits of their products.
This
is not the case when the government funds inquiry. In
this
case, the final verdict is more likely to be unbiased. To recapitulate, having mulled over above stated arguments and information, and deliberating all the facts, it can be deducted that the scientific examination carried and controlled by law making bodies is in the public interest.Private organizations,
on the other hand
, may have their own vexed interests to protect.
Submitted by nidhidel83 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: