Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Recently, there has been a ton of debates as to the traditional voting system. More specially, in regards to the passages, the
writer
puts forth the idea that we have two alternative our previous manner of voting to the modern method. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws in the
writer
’s claims. In fact, the professor believes utilizing computer when they vote might be an issue either and addresses in detail the trouble with each point made in the reading text.
First
and foremost, the author of the reading states that the poll can be imprecise. Some professional in the same field,
however
, stand in firm opposition to
this
claim. In the listening,
for example
, the professor states that not all people are the same. Some people can afford buying a computer and others will not,
moreover
, not all of folks are familiar with computers there still many people from 17s are alive. Are we prevented them from voting and take their right?. One group of scholars represented by the
writer
thinks that people make mistakes when they do calculations. Of course, though, not all experts in
this
field believe
this
is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically addresses
this
point when he states that even machines can make mistakes because computers were created by humans.
This
means people can do something wrong in programming,
thus
, it leads to failed process.
Finally
, the
writer
wraps his argument by positing that many complex processes utilize ballot, which means people cannot bear it and it will be hard for them. Not surprisingly, the lecture takes issue with
this
claim, contending that hard methods happened rarely. Approximately, it happens once every two years,
thus
,
this
reason is not enough to use electronics rather than us. To sum up, both the
writer
and professor hold conflicting views about the voting system, It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on
this
issue.
Submitted by abrarbalsh2 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
What to do next:
Look at other essays: