Some people think that the government should increase tax on unhealthy food to encourage people to start eating healthy. Do you agree or disagree?

It is thought by few that if governments increase the tax on rubble foods, it could motivate people to buy them.
as
Suggestion
As
a result, people’s tendency to eat healthy foods is increased and the rate of any gentle of disease that are related to eating rubble foods
consequently
is decreased. In
this
regard, I am in disagreement with
this
opinion, and believe that there are some other solutions that are most appropriate to eradicate
this
menace. A number of arguments surrounded my opinion.
To begin
with,
this
code that emphasis on increasing the tax on junk foods, like all the other similar policies, has negative effects on the middle and lower economic classes. To explain more, through
this
code the variety of choices for weak economic classes are decreased.
On the contrary
,
this
amiable of policies are not effective to motivate rich people to opt healthy foods rather than unhealthy foods. It is
also
worth recalling that pushing people to behave in a specific way could in turn, lead to dissatisfaction people. So, increasing the tendency to use healthy foods through these gentle of policies is optimistic.
On the other hand
, some researches indicate that in
this
era that huge range of men and women are employed, scant time is the most important factor which compel them to buy junk foods, so, it is obvious that increasing the cost of these gentle of foods do not have enough effect for them. Moving forward, I believe that informing people about the negative effects of junk foods on health, could lead to self-restrain them from buying unhealthy foods. The other policy that I think could be responsible to
this
menace, is making healthy foods more accessible in comparison compared to unhealthy foods. To do so, decreasing the cost of healthy foods could help policy-makers to reach for
this
goal. In conclusion, compelling people to eat healthy food, through increasing their price, without making them aware of the harmful effects of rubble foods, is not an appropriate policy and cannot help policy-makers to reach to the healthy society
such
as a main goal. To do so, decreasing the cost of healthy foods, to make them more accessible is more responsible to solve
this
menace.
Submitted by baran.bagheri96 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • unhealthy food
  • junk food
  • calorie-dense
  • taxing
  • incentivize
  • manufacturers
  • prohibitively expensive
  • disproportionately
  • low-income households
  • healthcare costs
  • obesity
  • diet-related diseases
  • punitive measures
  • lifestyle choices
  • government intervention
  • food industry
  • economic impact
What to do next:
Look at other essays: