Students at schools and universities learn far more from lessons with teachers than from others sources (such as the internet, television). To what extent do you agree or disagree? Introduction

Education in recent years has changed significantly, learners are becoming more adventurous in exploring other means of information other than only the ones obtained from their educators,

however

,

this

may have attracted criticisms from classroom proponents while arguing that scholars learn more in the conventional student and teacher setting, but I will try to explore all these in subsequent paragraphs. Foremost, the advantages of direct learning with the educator cannot be over emphasized, in the sense that it offers the learner a wild range of opportunity to assimilate

first

hand information from the instructor.

Furthermore it

Accept comma addition

Furthermore, it

provides a chance to ask questions after lectures and be clear in areas of doubt,

for example

, a learner might no be able to grasp a lecture all at once without

further

inquiries, which might not be applicable in other means of acquiring knowledge like the use of internet and television.

Moreover there

Accept comma addition

Moreover, there

are practical subjects that can only be sufficiently assimilated through hands on teachings rather than theoretical instructions that could be gotten through the media space. These are some of the pertinent points that could be raised from individuals who think students learn more with teachers, notwithstanding, should we disregard the other means of obtaining data?. The media space offers far more materials than that which could be assessed by a teacher,

besides

, an individual is only limited to the ideas provided by his or her lecturer,

for instance

, while we were in school and preparing for examination, we had to browse and Google to get as many facts and more explanation as we could about a particular topic and that proved to be very vital in our success,

additionally

, there is a saying that no man is an island of knowledge,

thus

, depending only on one source of information could be deleterious to a person's ambition. With the above salient submissions, In conclusion, I vehemently believe that both sources of acquiring knowledge should be adequately sorted,

nevertheless

, no one avenue is enough for optimum performance and professional growth.