In some countries celebrities get higher salaries than senior politicians. What do you think reason for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

In certain country Politicians are earning lesser salaries than celebrities has impacts among the people, which is both good and bad. In my opinion, it is because of the role they have is totally opposite that causes many to take only one of them Favors.

Therefore

Linking Words

, it depends on the choices of the public to create positive or negative development. So, I agree it has both of them and going to discuss both these views.

Firstly

Linking Words

, either politicians or someone they are honoured because of their ability

that is

Linking Words

totally unique but, wages are the factors people judge them for the profession they are involved.

For example

Linking Words

, a figure is worldwide famous and there is a huge number of public waiting to see them from other countries as well influences positively in their own land.

In addition

Linking Words

, celebrities having more salaries are good to make their art more promising.

However

Linking Words

, figure paid higher

also

Linking Words

have bad influence to public because in

such

Linking Words

cases politician are lesser valued who are higher skilled and brilliant in the development of the country.

For example

Linking Words

, a nation needs are not only limited to a topic that creates a bad effect to their people for fulfilling everyone basic necessity a leader have a vital role in every sector.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, if they are less valued in their land,

then

Linking Words

it may spread negative influences too. In conclusion, it is partially good for a nation to pay more to personality and, less to a politician.

Therefore

Linking Words

, wages must be based on certain rule as per requirement to their needs, but that could not be said a huge profit making star should not be paid properly.