Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is thought that overindulging has the same adverse impacts on health’s human as smoking, giving rise to be implemented prohibitions as cigarettes in several nations. In my opinion, the former view is well-founded,

however

the latter is rather unreasonable. To commence with, one evident explanation why consuming large amount of unnecessary

food

puts everyone in jeopardy is somewhat related to potential health hazards. To be more detailed, while people eating junk foods are susceptible to cardiovascular issues, obesity, and so on, smokers will be lung cancer, digestive matters, and other illnesses.

For example

, my cousin has been overweight on account of consuming excessive

food

intake on a regular basis, which will affect her physic development and especially her health rather like smoking.

Nevertheless

, I do not think that forbidding advertisements of foodstuffs

makes

Suggestion

make

significant contributions to diminishing the consumption of unhealthy

food

. An underlying factor to take under advisement is the purposes of advertising.

In other words

, it is indispensable to understand that that aims are not only selling goods, but

also

to inform or broaden consumers horizons regarding price, ingredients, etc.

Hence

, citizens have a variety of different options and know how well

this

food

is,

then

it is entirely

detrimented

by customers themselves. In fact, there is an enormous quantity of people smoking, regardless of banning advertisements and warning images as well. Eating junk

food

, smoking or not depend on them. In conclusion,

although

overeating bring about a wide range of insidious risks,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

opine that it is not essential for government to put almost advertisements down.