Some people think that because some children can find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that mathematics and philosophy should not be considered prominent on the curriculum due to their demanding level of understanding. I disagree with

this

view, because these subjects have tremendous educational value and could come in handy during the students’ lifetime.

Firstly

, delicate subjects can improve analytical thinking among students and can be a cornerstone to

further

academic achievements. The more difficult the subject is, the greater efforts are taken towards learning and developing certain skills. Admittedly, the children who are good at mathematics, have the capability to do the most versatile performance in the education field.

Moreover

, by teaching philosophy to children, it is possible to broaden their horizons, as well as encourage them to visualize in a multifaceted way and thereby assisting to clarify their long-term goals.

Finally

, the potential benefits of these subjects should be taken into consideration before leaving it out as optional ones.

In addition

, the children who fall behind learning mathematics can take extra lessons and catch up their peers.

For instance

, owing to

Japanese education system

Suggestion

the Japanese education system

, students are nurtured to develop their essential skills and are provided to take up extra courses with respect to these subjects. After having identified students’ weak points, they are concentrated to start core lessons, thence

this

, any kind of difficulties with these subjects are resolved and even it can be made all the more enjoyable because of

this

heuristic and productive learning environment. In conclusion, subjects which have some level of difficulty, should still be considered mandatory, as it helps to extend the children’s

outlooking

Suggestion

out looking

.