The government should lower the budget on the arts to allocate more money to education. To what extent do you agree?

It is clear that, the main responsibility of every

government

is providing the essential needs of society and developing a nation. There is dissension that the power should reduce outlay on the artwork and redirect

this

budget to develop the educational system of the country, while others disagree with

this

and claim that

art

projects still demand support from the

government

. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will now consider. On the one hand, there are many reasons to sponsor the idea that

art

plays a vital role in social life.

First

and foremost, the

art

is related to the identity and unity of people in a country,

Moreover

, no one can argue that the

art

reflects or the creativity of people in a certain time and place.

Furthermore

, traditional artwork can demonstrate national customs and lifestyle of people in the past.

In other words

,

art

Suggestion

artistic

diversity has been handed down for hundreds of years as a treasure,

that is

why people should not give it to oblivion.

On the other hand

, there are multifarious factors to fortify the educational institutions. Important to realise that subsidizing on

education

by the

government

is more consequential than paying attention to

art

.

Likewise

, developing

education

can produce better quality citizens and advanced skill employees to the global work market.

As a result

, the nation and the

government

attain a new level of industrialization and development in all areas of life eventually. To sum up, in my opinion, even though national artworks have sentimental value to a nation, it is not more necessary than

education

. From my point of view, the

government

should direct more resources to the expansion of

education

rather than funding for the

art

, as more benefits of

this

can lead to the prosperity in the future.