‘Prevention is better than cure’. Researching and treating disease is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures. To what extent do you agree?

Preventive measures for any stroke is a sagacious step as researching and treating an illness requires extravagant expenditure of money. In my opinion, I believe prophylaxis have been certainly a most advantageous course of action owing to the fact that the course of treatment and the number of tests has to go through can be a very draining experience.

In addition

to that, there is no guarantee of betterment.

Firstly

, preventive measures safeguard people from many diseases.

for

Suggestion

For

example, the current ongoing COVID-19 is spreading at a very fallacious speed and there is still no cure,

nevertheless

, it takes all the required prevention like wearing a mask, staying indoors, maintaining distance, washing hands and sanitising the surroundings, there are very insignificant chances of acquiring the illness.

However

, if individual contracts the Cancer, they have to go through a plethora of tests and spend several days in the hospital which culminates into massive incidental expenses.

Furthermore

, any illness immensely compromises one’s body as well as psychological resilience leading to emotional exhaustion as it is not certain for a sickness ridden individual to recuperate as there are many diseases can only get supportive care for. Taking AIDS, for,

for example

, there is absolutely no chance of improvement in one’s health as there has not yet been any treatment made from

this

disease.

However

, by taking precautions can easily save themselves from

such

deadly diseases. To consummate, I strongly assent that prevention of a condition is better than its cure as in my opinion, I do not see spending money excessively over treatment along with mental disturbance as a calculated action.