Governments should speand money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Having an efficient transport system always

s

Add an article

a

show examples

ignificant factor to determine the progress of a country. It is sometimes thought that the authority requires to channelise more financial assistance to the development of railway lines than roads. I strongly support

this

since

this

is more fast and reliable. The

first

and foremost reason to allocate more fund to construct railway lines is much useful than roadways.

This

is because

this

mode of transportation is far

more

Change the word

apply

show examples

faster than another one.

For instance

, when travelling from Kerala to Mumbai requires around 28 hours via road, the train requires only 16 hours, sometimes even less and the journey is far more comfortable and inexpensive.

Therefore

, funding to train services is considered to be beneficial. Another fact to consider here is that trains are punctual when it compares with the bus services. The reason is that in check-posts are automated and have implemented the electronic tracking system to maintain a regular

uninterupted

Correct your spelling

uninterrupted

flow of traffic.

However

, on the lane,

for example

, there are many factors which are hardly controlled by electronic devices. The precision and punctuality rarely followed since roadway users often break the traffic rules

such

as speeding, driving

w

Change the article

the

show examples

rong side and so on. In conclusion, people often think that it is better to fund the development of railway lines than road transport system. In my opinion, I support

this

view as

this

is faster and punctual in terms of its operations. It is highly recommended that every authority needs to put an extra effort to implement

this

into reality.