Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

#think #scientists #messages #space #life #forms

It is thought that some scientists need to get in touch with

ailean

Correct your spelling

Eileen

species, while others think

that is

too risky for human.

This

essay examines both types of views, and I will give my perspective below.

To begin

with, nobody can be certain who lives in space because nobody sees them and has no information about them. If that situation happens, a huge problem can be caused, which costs human life.

Therefore

, it is completely wrong to communicate with

ailens

Correct your spelling

aliens

. Individuals on Earth do not want to take a big risk.

Secondly

on the other hand

, it has a bright side

also

For example

, if we can find an alien and they are friendly with Earth, people would live a better world because maybe they give to a human about their uninnovated technology.

Also

, economical aspects, researching and development can make a lot of job opportunities for people. That R&D organisation

such

as NASA needs good manpower obviously because they keep going their work. According to a survey conducted by a local newspaper named 'BULLET TIMES' in 2018 approximately 80% of respondents answered 'agree' to question 'Do you agree with a project that tries to touch with other life forms in space?'

This

result means people live on the Earth, they would like to touch with ailean and they wondering a space.

Finally

, in my opinion, researching and development need to human life because it will give a lot of advantages more than disadvantages. I always imagine living on Mars.

Submitted by ieltsirene on Thu Nov 12 2020

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

10Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Grammar mistakes
 

5 paragraphs

251 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 7.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 7.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 5.5

Complete response

5.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

8.5
band
Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The assertion that contemporary society can no longer elevate any individual as an idol due to the inevitable erosion of reputation under outlets survey is a topic of contention. While some argue the pervasive influence of media audits tarnishes the image of public figures, others maintain true ikons can withstand such challenges and continue to inspire. This essay will delve into both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint on the matter.
7.5
band
Large companies use sport events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Major companies frequently sponsor sports events to advertise their goods. Some believe that this development has a damaging impact on the spirit of sports. Large companies use sports competition to develop their commodity that this has positive effect to sport also has some negative impact on sports.
6.5
band
Government should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students, rather than supporting professional sports and art performance for general public.
It is often argued that spending more money on athletes is more important than the development of sports and art for school students, although both of them are important but, I think that investing money to extend sports and art in school is more useful for the country. And in this essay, I try to explain why.
7.5
band
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
With the advancement of urban developments, a growing rate of young adults from suburbs move to cities, seeking better employment. This leads to an imbalanced population between rural and urban areas. Some argue that this brings a positive impact on the country as a whole, while I believe that there are substantial negative consequences.
5.5
band
Modern technology has greatly changed how we work and is of benefit to all societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The contemporary state-of-the-art technological tools have revolutionised the way companies are operating which has many positive outcomes on men and women across the world. I completely support this viewpoint because a great number of individuals in the world are working from home, enhance their life satisfaction more than ever before.

Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Fully explain your ideas

Large companies use sport events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Government should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students, rather than supporting professional sports and art performance for general public.

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Modern technology has greatly changed how we work and is of benefit to all societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?