Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?

There is an opinion that after leaving jail, many

criminals

often break the law once again. The following essay will examine the main reasons for

this

tendency and

also

provide possible ways to solve

this

possessing social issue.

To begin

with, one major factor which entails relapse with

offenders

is that it is almost impossible for them to integrate into a health society after being sentenced. To put it differently, as many companies reject to offer them workplaces, some lawbreakers cannot find the financial resources for food and accommodation, and the only option for them to survive is to commit a crime once again to be imprisoned, and

governments

will cover their basic necessities in jail. As a case in point, in Russia, almost all companies in major spheres do not accept people who have recently left prison, and there is no exception based on the type of crime.

As a result

, the country has a high level of recidivism. From my point of view, valid support from

governments

and social organisations can potentially help to tackle

this

pressing complication.

First

of all, as many

criminals

require help after being sentenced, it will be effective for social communities to organise the special training sessions from a variety of work spheres, so

offenders

can find a job after their incarceration. To illustrate

this

point, in a multitude of countries, different projects were launched which were aimed at providing educational sessions to

offenders

with some practical activities,

thus

after leaving jail they could find a valid job.

Moreover

,

governments

can potentially support lawbreakers by setting the requirements for corporations to provide

criminals

with workplaces. In conclusion, the tendency with

offenders

to break the law once again is all too familiar nowadays. I totally believe that the difficulties to find their place in society and gain money for their life are the main points which contribute to

such

a negative movement. Had

governments

and social organisations shifted their emphasis to proactive actions as offering the educational programmes for

criminals

and putting certain obligations for companies, the rate of recidivism would have been drastically decreased.