In most countries prisons are popular actions against people who do crime. However, educating people against crimes can be more effective solution. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Majority of countries are in favour that prison is the most effective solution for

criminals

, while others believe that providing education to them would be more beneficial. I personally partially agree with

this

notion, prison is the best solutions for hardcore

criminals

such

as rapist and serial killer,

however

, for minor

criminals

like shoplifting and juvenile

crime

can be reduced by educating them.

To begin

with,

criminals

who commit serious

crime

should be sent to prisons. People who engaged in

crimes

such

as serial killing, rapist, kidnapper and drug traffickers should be rewarded with hard sentences as these activities are not minor and these people have not righted to walk freely on streets. Educating them would be a waste of resources as they have enough experience in that, they enjoy these

crimes

and only do them for money.

Therefore

, by sending them to prison is the only prominent solution for the government to tackle

this

crime

down.

On the other hand

, providing counselling and education assistance to

criminals

who commit minor

crimes

such

as shoplifting, robbery and traffic rules violence could be decreased. These illegal activities emerged due to lack of education and proper parental supervision,

such

crimes

might be alleviated if they can be noticed from an early age in children.

For example

, it has been noticed that if students are taught with self-discipline and self-esteem they are less likely to be involved in

crimes

. To conclude, culprits with dangerous activities should be sent to jails,

however

, other minor

crimes

could be mitigated with the help of parents and government awareness campaigns. From my perspective, these two types of

criminals

can be treated differently according to their

crime

and background credentials.