Some people think the government should not spend on international aid because there are disadvantaged people in their country, such as the unemployed and homeless. Do you agree or disagree?
In the past years, the population rate has grown at an alarming rate across the globe.
This
has given rise to leading problems such
as poverty, unemployment and illiteracy. Few believe that the governing body should not provide financial assistance to the nations across the border because there are underprivileged people
in their own country
. I completely agree with this
statement that a country
's own betterment should be first
prioritized.
To begin
with, there are abundant reasons for which the authority should put efforts for the welfare of its own people
. Apparently, the monetary resources are becoming scarce and many countries
are already in debt. It is ,therefore
, imperative for a state to reserve its funds for the development and maintenance of its own institutions. Additionally
, major steps such
as providing free healthcare and shelter to the homeless can assist in boosting the social health of the society. Also
, providing more employment opportunities will aid to decrease the ratio of poor in the territory. For example
, during the pandemic of Coronavirus, the developed nation like America faced a huge financial loss due to which it was not in a position to provide help to the neighbouring countries
,instead
, it had to invest more in medical assistance for the well-being of its own country
people
.
On the other hand
, it is understandable and reasonable to donate money to the poorer nations as a gesture of basic human decency and humanity. For which a nation should firstly
survey about the financial statistics and destitution ratios within the country
. With reference to these figures, a decision can be made whether to help the developing countries
. However
, the countries
receiving support are not committed to remaining loyal to the donor country
in times of crisis. Hence
the donor states also
need to be aware of the fact that they contribute only their share and do not overdo the succour.
To conclude, there are obvious benefits for the bureaucracy in the long run from donating money as relief aids to many foreign countries
. However
, I strongly iterate that the administration must first
improve the economic, financial and employment prospects of its own people
before embarking on humanitarian work abroad.Submitted by madhuranijadhav on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.