Recently, the issue of providing international aids has drawn the attention of the public worldwide. Many
people
argue that it is hard to support all of the world’s residents and
governments
should focus on their domestic satisfaction rather than offering international aid
forChange preposition
show examples
other
countries
.
Although
I agree with
this
argument that it is impossible to help all the world’s
citizens
, I disagree with them that administrations should concentrate solely on
the Remove the article
show examples
local needs. In
this
essay, I will discuss my point of view thoroughly.
On the one hand, the world’s leaders’ hesitation over the provision of international aids to undeveloped regions is legitimate. It is unreasonable that
governments
’ support could reach all of the poor as their number is enormous and they exist in separate places around the globe.
In addition
, these community members have a myriad of needs and
this
could lead to various issues in helping them. Developed
countries
,
for instance
, may encounter numerous obstacles as they send food and medical aids to poor communities in Africa due to the lack of transportation and severe climate conditions. Because of
such
issues,
governments
spend money to assist other
countries
, while they struggle to take care of their public because of the local financial burdens.
In other words
, leaders should prioritize the well-being of their
citizens
before spending much money on
globalAdd an article
show examples
assistant, which could affect their economy drastically.
On the other hand
,
governments
should help as many
people
as they can regardless of the notion of helping all
people
on the planet. Rich
countries
should assist struggling ones in their vital humanitarian sectors
such
as health, nutrition and education. Nations,
for instance
, that include
domesticAdd an article
show examples
threat of famine or contagions
such
as Yemen should be assisted by its neighbours.
This
humanitarian cause of assistance will have a considerable psychological impact on residents of prosperous regions as well as the poor.
This
appears as they deter any sense of alienation, fragmentation, or lost in favour of the enjoyment of charity and belonging to the world public.
Therefore
, helping
citizens
overseas not only helps the poor to live respectfully but
also
promotes the idea of self-devotion and belonging among rich publics.
In conclusion, in
opinionCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
,
the Correct article usage
show examples
world leaders should lend their struggling
neighborsChange the spelling
show examples
a hand to offer help to
people
in need. If
governments
should satisfy the domestic needs of their
citizens
, and assist others to promote good humanitarian relationships
besides
achieving political
competenceReplace the word
show examples
among nations.