Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Few individuals contend that the loin share of the government transportation budget must be allocated for

railways

instead

of

roads

.

On the other hand

,

people

advocate that a better infrastructure of

roads

plays significant roles in the prosperity of a nation but actually, there are certain pros and cons of both strategies. I believe that the spending on mass transit services like

railways

, and subways have more gains than on

roads

.

To begin

with, there are a few positives of funding

roads

and highways. Improved

roads

provide easy access to hospitals, schools and universities for the residents of remote areas where mega transportation projects are not feasible.

This

development will improve the lifestyle of the dwellers in those localities

such

as rural

people

will earn more money by selling their products directly in urban markets.

Furthermore

, it can prevent metropolitans to be overpopulated, as

people

would have a convenient approach to all amenities due to efficient

roads

.

On the contrary

, there are enormous advantages to promote

railways

.

First

and foremost, trains can significantly decline the emission of greenhouse gases which would make the environment cleaner.

For instance

, the number of vehicles would be reduced on

roads

when

people

use trains for the commit to work, that would decrease the noise level and environmental pollution in cities.

Secondly

, as travelling by trains is very cost-effective as compared to cars , so it can save a handsome amount of money for

people

every month. In conclusion, I think that even though an efficient

roads

network enhances the mobility of citizens, it can lead to devastating consequences like pollution, and traffic issues. The merits of spending on

railways

are far more than funding

roads

.