some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. others,however , argue the circumstance of an individual crime ,and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It is generally argued that certain crime needs fixed penalties or flexible ones. both arguments should consider in fairly and

this

essay will be looking at both side and I will give an opinion on it. On the one hand,

people

argue that standardized punishment considering more advantages than disadvantages. The main reason for

this

way is more efficient, transparent and easy to manage.

Moreover

, it is clear the judgement procedure and penalties to everyone in the society and

people

will consider those before take any illegal steps.

For example

, today everybody knows what are the penalties for parking. ,

Also

this

system

is fair for every person in the country without any categories like ethnicity, gender or race.

on the other hand

, it is often believed that every crime should be considered separately by the justice

system

. Many

people

pointing out most crimes could happen without any intence and

this

should enter the transparent justice

system

and must stand

accordingly

to follow the suitable procedure to solve each case.

For instance

, these days very common of stealing good from supermarket and groceries, reason of these are feeding families. ,

Also

most crimes, like murders happen due to reason of self-defence. So our legal

system

must consider all factors and another side of the story. In conclusion,

people

are debating which is suitable for our legal

system

fixed or flexible punishment. I believe every justice

system

in the world must consider and follow the different procedure for each case before giving punishment.