Countries should produce the food that their population eat, and import as little as possible. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Since the beginning of time agriculture is what make it possible for humans to thrive and evolve. Currently, every nation grows some of their basic needs and buy from other places the rest.

However

, there are some individuals who believe that each country should produce their own

food

in almost totality. I tend to disagree with that statement because it is either impossible or economically silly.

Firstly

, some types of crops only grow in specific environments, which would be expensive to replicate.

In other words

, some kinds of

food

only thrive in cold weather while others need a warm climate and water.

For example

,

countries

that have extreme weather would have to build controlled environments to achieve

this

.

Therefore

, the prices would rise substantially because replicate different climates is too expensive.

Secondly

, even in

countries

with regular

temperatures

Add a comma

,temperatures

show examples

this

is impossible.

This

is because the country would have to build farms where there are houses or technology companies now. Take Japan as an example.

This

nation lacks land and to be able to grow most of their

food

they would have to destroy their technology factories to give space for crops.

Nevertheless

, there is not enough land to be sustainable in the long term. In conclusion, I totally disagree that all nations should stop import

food

.

This

is because in places where it is possible the prices would rise exponentially and in other

countries

this

is impracticable.

Thus

,

this

would make our world retrocede in time as most

countries

would be worried about agriculture.