Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

It is considered by some that researchers and scientists should provide unlimited access to
information
they expose in their
studying
Replace the word
studies
show examples
to the public.
However
, other people believe that
such
kind of knowledge is crucially precious to disseminate it through the crowd. I am personally of the
first
opinion.
This
essay will give reasons why.
To begin
with, to my mind, hiding
information
from society is unfair in terms of human rights.
That is
why each of us deserves to acquire new knowledge with no obstacles.
Moreover
, those of us who truly desire to be into science can bring use to researchers complementing experiments with extra
information
.
For example
, it is commonly known that self-taught tend to observe a lot more locations while surfing animals and their habitats,
in particular
. Thereby, they collect way
to
Correct your spelling
too
show examples
more
Correct quantifier usage
much
show examples
information
than real scientists could do by themselves. Not rarely do the formers share their notions with the letters and never receive feedback. I see that situation as way beyond unfair. Despite all the given proofs abort necessity of spreading the knowledge , one might mention that the disposable sharing could lead the threat for safety and stability since some spheres of studying can provoke criminals to use it against the law.They say ,
for instance
, that scientific findings in nuclear physics which are unlimited for each internet user can be easily adapted to creating an extremely dangerous weapon.
Consequently
, cancelling the spreading of
information
is for the best. Even so, in my view, crime and science do not have a common thing since offenders are the responsibility of the police. They are not an excuse to deprive other populations of breakthroughs. In conclusion, I would say that limiting people from studying is not a solution for preventing criminality and there is no need to establish barriers between society and science. I hope individuals who are of the opposite opinion will reconsider their views in the future.
Submitted by diana.karyamina on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • information sharing
  • scientific research
  • business
  • academic world
  • advancement of knowledge
  • progress
  • collaboration
  • cross-disciplinary research
  • open access
  • democratization of information
  • transparency
  • credibility
  • intellectual property
  • security concerns
  • commercial interests
What to do next:
Look at other essays: