In some countries, celebrities can now earn more than senior politicians. what might be the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development?

In few nations, senior political leaders are making a lesser amount of money than

celebrities

. I am of the firm opinion that

this

is very bad for

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society and it is going to do more harm than benefit.The following paragraphs will discuss the main cause for

this

. One of the main causes for the stark difference in earnings is that

celebrities

are more popular than

politicians

.

For instance

, whenever I switch on my television there are more chances of me seeing a celebrity on a channel than a politician. A consequence of

this

is that advertising agencies approach

celebrities

more which results in them making fortunes.

In contrast

,

politicians

do none or very few advertisements. A major reason for

this

is that

politicians

are generally not allowed to do advertisements by the law. Another factor that contributes to the lesser earning of

a political representatives

Correct the article-noun agreement

political representatives

a political representative

show examples

is their goals. Normally,

politicians

work for the socio-economic development of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society rather than their own personal gain.

For example

, from time to time

politicians

have used their own personal funds for the development of the country. The polar opposite to

that is

the

celebrities

whose main aim may be to earn a lot of money. Overall, the personal goal and the law of the country results in

politicians

making less income than

celebrities

. I remain of the opinion that

this

is regression for the society because if only the

politicians

earned more money than the

celebrities

this

would have influenced the youth to do social work and join politics.