There are severe social consequences to housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The notion of myriad social matters arising

the

Change preposition

from the

show examples

shortage of housing in urban

areas

has been progressively contentious and some advocate that they are solely pragmatically remedies by the

government

. In my opinion, whilst their viewpoints seem legitimate because private sectors in

this

area are low and the

government

is capable of bearing the burden of responsibility. The most frequently cited rationale for the limited support from private enterprises is profit focuses objective.

This

argument rests on the fact that real estate in construction firms is driven to generate profit which is purely inclined towards serving the wealthy.

This

can be apparently seen in lavish apartments in New York City, which are constructed at the expense of

government

housing projects.

In addition

, the impoverished citizenry is forced out of their home and

this

drags them

further

from their work,

thus

triggering a wide breadth of social instability. Albeit conceding the private businesses have no responsibility, the

government

intervention plays a pivotal role in containing these consequences to scarcity of houses.

This

is predicated based on the assumption that the governments construct infrastructures themselves using taxes or bids from construction companies. The clearest evidence of

this

can be seen in various undeveloped or poorly planned

areas

for new houses where the private housing developers are predisposed to set foot in and bid.

Accordingly

, these

areas

are often unavailable for commercial exploitation which provides governors more power over business moguls.

Hence

, the governments having full liability confers a valid standpoint as they can generate new residential

areas

with affordable prices for their citizens. In conclusion, whilst private companies are not concerned about social aspects into account as the

government

is the key catalyst for all housing options. From my point of view, I personally reckon that the enforcement agencies and private city planners should enact holistic approaches and strike some balance in providing convenient and affordable homes.