It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
With the development of technology, people at the present day can travel to the remote natural environment. It is widely discussed among people over countries. On the one hand, the expansion of the active range brings a series of advantages.
First
Linking Words
of all, human beings could see more spectacular views than past. Everyone has the ability to travel anywhere like the South Pole, the North Pole even the bottom of the sea.
In addition
Linking Words
, scientists may exploit resources that are buried somewhere human has not reached.
Last
Linking Words
, scientists could get a clear perspective of the Earth which is beneficial to humanity. But in my opinion,
such
Linking Words
an argument suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. From another perspective, the advancement of technology is attended by environmental disasters. People only can reach remote environments at the expense of destroying nature. A recent study conducted by the World Academy of Environment revealed that more than 900 square kilometres of the forest has been deforested. More, it is dangerous for travelling to some no-man area. As I know, my neighbour Yu Qian who is a famous exploiter has lost his life on an excursion in a desert where depart from society. In conclusion, I strongly suppose that the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages. Nature plays a significant role in the history of humanity. We should take effective measures to protect the environment rather than exploit it. The exploitation activities of Earth have damaged the surroundings. We should limit the frequency
also
Linking Words
the intense of affecting nature.
Submitted by qqcfgxy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • remote natural environment
  • scientific research
  • climate change
  • environmental preservation
  • economic benefits
  • conservation efforts
  • habitat disruption
  • pollution
  • cultural disruption
  • indigenous populations
  • commercialization
  • safety risks
  • personal enrichment
  • ecosystems
  • awareness
  • appreciation for nature
What to do next:
Look at other essays: