Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It can not be denied that domestic

governments

know the local environmental issues better, and

such

a fact leads impressionable people to generate the idea that it is better to deal with the environmental problems.

However

,

such

an opinion needs to be scrutinized meticulously before a conclusion can be reached. As far as effectiveness,efficiency, and globalization are concerned, I hold the opinion that it is necessary to tackle

this

problem on a global scale.

First

and foremost, global

organizations

have more complete data and professional experts from all over the world.

As a result

, they can play a bigger role in solving some complex problems

such

as global warming or deforestation.

Such

problems cannot be dealt with in a single country. Another reason is that global

organizations

have an extraordinary influence over domestic

governments

. International corporates would obey the rules made by global

organizations

.

For example

, companies like Tesco or UNIQLO are promoting recycling activities led by global

organizations

. national

governments

know better about their local situation. It means that they can adopt approaches that are efficient and useful.

For example

, some pieces of animal are endangered like pandas. For

this

question, Chinese

governments

know better about how to protect them since they only service in China. In conclusion， while one sees zero and another sees a circle,

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

am confident that my opponents will

yied

Correct your spelling

yield

died

after being shown to my article