Some governments spend a lot of public money training individuals to be successful in international sporting events. Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Certain governments spend a lot of public money to train their athletes to be successful in international sporting events meanwhile, some people said the allocation should be channelled on things that benefited the general public more. I partially disagree with the statement. In my opinion, the budget allocation should be well-balanced
instead
. Either highest achievement in
sports
or community's needs, both are equally important.
For example
,
sports
school. The development of
such
not only managed to produce a good athlete but
also
an academician. Here, the basic input of a student is being taken care of, academic and non-academic subjects,
hence
, more active students can be produced.
Second
, the sport's infrastructures should not be mutually exclusive for athletes unless it is private property. The places must be opened to the public as well. They are the taxes payers and they,of course, should be very delighted to use the arena or swimming pool.
Further
, a healthy lifestyle manage to be promoted here. In turn, many modifiable diseases
such
as heart attack can be reduced in our country.
On the other hand
, if the allocation is focused on non-mainstream
sports
, I totally disagree. Only one side of the parties seems to gain the benefit. To illustrate, let us take handball sport as an example. In Malaysia,
this
game is not really popular indeed, not many people want to play it due to many reasons. One of them is exposure to primary and secondary students. At
this
stage no point in the government spending a lot of money to build up an international level handball arena because minimal citizens would like to play it. In conclusion, budget allocations for
sports
and the public should be planned and must be equally distributed so that both sides get the advantages between taxpayers and the government.
Submitted by sufianardi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: