Wealthy Nations should assists poorer countries with Humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or diagree?

In the modern ,world it is a common belief that wealthy
countries
such
as Canada, the USA, the UK, Australia and many more
countries
have a vigorous economic balance. So these
countries
should be helped to other counties where there are fragile economic ,especially during the natural disasters.
However
, I fully agree with
this
statement, I opine that wealthy
countries
should have enough responsibility to look after other
nations
due to the lack of facilities and suffering things. No doubt say, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the USA has a vigorous economic balance and they are the ones who controlled the earth, denying that those
states
are the dominant democratic
nations
on
this
planet somehow there are
also
have fragile economic state
such
as Sri Lanka, Uganda, Ethiopia. those governments do have not enough money to spend for their community. So, the wealthy
states
should be helped to them in some pathetic situation.
For example
, during the Tsunami people are most suffering due to the absence of their necessary thing,
then
most rich
countries
never hesitate to donate some basic things for them,
such
as food, clothes, water and many more. on
this
pathetic disaster season people who come from the poor-socio family , the background may face misery situations lack of their necessary things.
Furthermore
, during natural disasters,
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
vigorous union should be maintained . It is crystal clear that most of the people who come from wealthy backgrounds may likely perpetuate their economic stability as their prestige and
states
. They are willing to help them due to strengthening their economy. When they support the fragile
nations
they knew it may help to share their
states
with around the world,
However
supporting to other nationalities not only perpetuate their economy but
also
may boost the sense of brotherhood, unity, collaborative success, teamwork, Foe example, during the tyranny, the USA, the UK likely to interact with them as a chain of brotherhood. To sum up, having a strengthening economic background state could be helped to other
nations
as a sense of brotherhood as well as it may easy to perpetuate their economic
states
between them. So supporting the fragile community may accelerate grand bonds all around the world and I can see it as an optimistic concern for all the community.
Submitted by Sandu  on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
What to do next:
Look at other essays: