Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource, while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Many believe that it is crucial for governments to oversee public supplies of freshwater. In my opinion,
this
is an advisable strategy though there are natural risks that must be taken into consideration. The most significant drawbacks to
this
proposal are the possibilities of
government
malfeasance and incompetence. The
government
are notoriously bureaucratic organizations that often waste time and money while not greatly furthering the interests of the general public. A pertinent example of
this
would be the lengthy litigation battles concerning the cleanup of polluted reservoirs in many democratic nations. By the time any progress is made, the harm for some residents may already be irreversible. There is the chance that the
government
is corrupt. It is common for both elected and unelected officials to be vulnerable to bribery that results in prioritizing corporate and private interests above-average citizens.
Nonetheless
,
government
control of freshwater supplies is the best guarantee of public safety. Today, in many arid nations,
such
as those near Sub-Saharan Africa, finding drinking
water
is a massive challenge. Conflicts over limited
water
resources often contribute to political instability. In an ideal world, a just
government
could ensure
water
is equally and fairly distributed.
Moreover
, there are potential safety concerns.
Water
can easily be contaminated by industrial factors including rainwater pollution, landfill seepage, and new procedures like fracking. If governments regulate
water
with disinterested autonomy, they will be able to protect the general public from the excesses of corporate recklessness. In conclusion, despite the potential that governments will poorly manage
water
supplies, they are still the best protectors of public health and safety.
This
is why the supervision of
water
authorities is
also
key.
Submitted by nyalapellinavin on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • limited resource
  • manage responsibly
  • shortages
  • environmental impact
  • over-extraction
  • wastage
  • quotas
  • pricing structures
  • efficient use
  • bureaucratic red tape
  • market mechanisms
  • competition, innovation, and investment
What to do next:
Look at other essays: