Some feel government should invest in preserving minority language; while, others feel this is not good use of resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Humans use

languages

to communicate and to express their feelings to others. One thought believes that the

government

should preserve a minor dialect; while, others oppose that.

This

will highlight both notions and I believe to save old

languages

because they relate to our ancestors. Manifold reasons to save minority

languages

and one of the factors is that every nation has its own culture and its roots are connected to its history that tells a lot of things about the people who lived thousands of years ago. The

government

should preserve minor dialects so that

further

and

next

generations should know about their heritage. If they do not know and use minority

languages

then

it totally vanishes.

For example

, in recent news of Egypt, the

government

are trying to encourage youngsters to learn the ancient Egyptian

language

so that they know about how great their ancestors

.

Add a missing verb

were.

show examples

However

, in ,contrast side, many feel that saving heritance

language

is a waste of time because in

this

cutting edge era, learning the major dialect is more important than to own

language

in owning to

this

getting a job in a well-established company, the English tongue is the priority among employers.

For instance

, in India, the popularity of the English

language

is more among the youth to get an employment offer in a Multinational company and increasing of English spoken person rise up to 50% according to Times of India.

Therefore

, many people are investing in a minority dialect is a waste of resources. To conclude, I would reiterate my viewpoint, old

languages

belong to our ancestors and many youngsters are forgetting their culture, to adapt to the new ones and the

government

should take some steps to preserve

this

.