Lectures were used in the past with many students. With modern technology available for education, there is no justification for this way of teaching. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

Giving a speech is the best conventional method of teaching, especially when the number of audiences is a lot. But some other students choose the individual version of learning according to technology. Personally, I firmly agree that lecture is the most traditional method for all students, while technology is developing. and

To begin

with traditional tactics, from my perspective lecture in academic places

such

as universities and schools, devastate the interaction between classmates and tutors and it can lead to a decline in learning quality of all kinds of student disorders. Secondary, without that ,scholarships lose their sense of competition. ,

,

Change the punctuation

apply

show examples

Finally

Add a comma

,Finally

show examples

another method of learning of learnings are appropriate for lots of practical fields needing experience and work in practice

such

as doctors, engineers, and some jobs like plumbers, electricians etc because they have to work in action, online and approaches are suitable for a theoretical syllabus.

On the other hand

side, technology is changing faster and faster. Taking advantage of the modern era, make the most of it in the advantage of decreasing the cost of education by eliminating physical classes and lectures and replacing them with distance- learning.

Moreover

, a vast majority of individuals, who are living in remote areas cannot be taught unless on the internet ground. To sum up, I believe,

although

other unconventional ways of teaching have lots of benefits and sometimes outweigh traditional ways , still have their hand sight so I think a combination of lecture and distance-learning will be the best option.