Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources (the internet or television). To extent do you agree or disageree?

It is argued that a student absorbs more learning with an educator rather than with other learning materials

such

as the internet or

television

.

This

essay agrees with the statement mentioned above because the lesson that the pupil does not understand can be answered instantly, and the value of personal interaction. Education plays a vital role in shaping an individual. Modern technology has provided a wide variety of resources on how to educate; education programs through websites and

television

are examples.

However

, the lecturer has a difference because when the lecture needs clarification, the educator can provide an immediate explanation;

thus

, the student better understands the course.

For instance

, one question kept on coming into my head during my science class; when I asked my

teacher

, she provided me with the answer that enlightened me that day itself.

In addition

, the primary role is the advantage of personal interaction that the

teacher

can contribute. Understanding the student is more open with an educator because of the brain-storming, supplying various ideas with the

teacher

,

teacher

-student question and answer presently.

Furthermore

, respect and trust for whom the pupil gives to the lecturer cannot be applied on the internet or

television

Change preposition

on television

show examples

.

For example

, there were mistakes in my assignment, and I knew that my

teacher

would give me an honest review. And until today, I still remember those communications during school with my teachers. In conclusion, I completely agree that teachers are way better than the internet or

television

because an immediate answer to a doubtful lecture can be clarified, and the worth of direct communication.