Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Recently, numerous

cities

are being developed for various purposes.

Although

some claim that

cities

should be attractive to boost their local

economy

, others argue that the service of a

city

other than beauty is more relevant for the well-being of the inhabitants. On the one hand, many may believe that urban areas should be beautified. The principal reason for

this

is to increase the local

economy

. A well-decorated

city

attracts more tourists, unlike those that are not decorated. If tourists visit

such

cities

, it will help build their economic status.

For example

, the

city

of Lagos is known for its beautiful gardens,resorts and beachfront.

This

planned beauty has increased tourists annually and

also

became a place of highly influential people.

On the other hand

, other individuals believe that the service is the most important aspect of a

city

's development. A

city

should have basic amenities

such

as educational institutions, health facilities and good transport networks to serve the people.

Consequently

,

this

will improve the standard of living of residents.

For instance

, Beijing is one of the best

cities

in the world due to its provision of leading basic facilities to sustain life.

Furthermore

, functional towns are more attractive options for businesses and companies to run efficiently and boost the

economy

which later can help create a beautiful place.

Therefore

, in planning a

city

, the focus should be given to its functionality. In conclusion,

although

, beautifying a

city

is beneficial in terms of increasing the

economy

. I am of the opinion that the components of a

city

surpass beauty.

This

is because the basic infrastructure will make an impact on the well-being of the people.