Some people think that old buildings should be knocked down to give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

As cities develop more and more, a number of people support the view that old
buildings
should be replaced with modern ones.
However
, I totally disagree with
this
point because maintaining them is going to be more advantageous in the long run and a more economical option. There are several reasons why it is reasonable to preserve old structures. Apparently, many of them have historical and cultural values depicting how our ancestors lived in the past which is why they must be preserved for the future generation. Even UNESCO designates diverse heritage sites and architecture worldwide to explain that the places are important resources of the past and serve as an inspiration for the future.
In addition
, these ancient
buildings
have unique aesthetic elements compared to modern
buildings
, which provide various opportunities to learn about varying architectural designs.
Furthermore
, they can play an important role in tourism
even
Correct word choice
and even
show examples
provide economic benefits.
Additionally
, even with safety issues, it is better to keep them intact as it is not that costly to renovate and restore them using our sophisticated technologies. There are plenty of affordable yet high-quality and sustainable construction materials that can be used in the process.
This
can
also
contribute to the level of the building’s economic value in a shorter period of time than destroying them for the new structures. In Sydney, all of the heritage
buildings
are protected only allowing contractors to change their interior design, so the exterior can maintain their historical and cultural shapes. In conclusion, even though some old
buildings
have some safety problems, they have more historical, educational and economic values.
Therefore
, they should be restored with sustainable materials and conserved rather than simply replacing them.
Submitted by Karin on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Heritage conservation
  • Historical edifice
  • Cultural legacy
  • Architectural marvel
  • Preservationist
  • Urban landscape
  • Economic revitalization
  • Tourist hub
  • Adaptive reuse
  • Cultural fabric
  • Aesthetic appeal
  • Environmental sustainability
  • Civic identity
  • Preservation criteria
  • Structural integrity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: