Missions to explore space are hugely expensive, and there are problems on Earth which demand attention. The number of these missions needs to be reduced. Do you agree or disagree?

In some particular countries, only a bunch of

people

are loaded with money as they get higher paychecks than the rest of the population. Some are supporting

this

situation while others contradict and claim that power owners of the country should have legal protection for equality of payment. In

this

essay, I will explore the views of both sides and I will argue that equality in earnings is the only way to the general well-being of society. There may be some strong arguments to advocate the richness of less amount of

people

.

To begin

with, capitalism brings us enormous companies with a great number of profits every year. As

this

goes on, the owner of those companies would undoubtedly be one of the richest

people

.

This

is a thing to defend because as those

people

get wealthier, the company gets wealthier and

consequently

, the finance of that country improves with the support of that one patron.

Moreover

, since the idea of liberalism is on the rise all over the world, the salary or superb of a particular person should not be questioned by society.

On the other hand

,

this

unfortunate disparity in revenues generates some sounding tackles around the citizens.

First

of all,

people

might get more and more desperate each they as they are underpaid. To detail, consider a worker endeavouring each day for his employer

however

, at the end of the month, he receives a paycheck

that is

far below what he assumes that he deserved.

Thus

, inevitably, the same person and millions of other

people

just like him would feel miserable. In conclusion, even though the richness of a particular group may have some benefits for the country, in my opinion, the happiness of the entire public is more essential. For that reason, I believe paychecks must be controlled by the government.