Governments should spend money on railways than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree??

There is a general vantage point that authorities should invest money in railroads

instead

of roads. I completely agree with that idea, in the forthcoming, paragraphs I shall explain my point of view.

As

Change preposition

From

show examples

environmental

Add an article

an environmental

show examples

perspective, both construction and utilization are not environmentally friendly because of the large volume of oil products in construction and the petroleum consumption of drivers using roads. A good instance of

this

issue is; in 2019 only in Britain more than each part of the world use the petrol to transport goods via trailer because of lack of

railway

substructure, in another word most of the

harbor

Change the spelling

harbour

show examples

has no access to national

railway

national network, causing gasoline consumption that year was increased about 20%. Not only road construction has not been environmentally friendly but

also

using cars on the road could be a detrimental impact on it in order to greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere.

On the other hand

,

railway

infrastructure has always been one of the best routes to transport anything from place to place, where

cost-effective

Replace the word

cost-effectiveness

show examples

is essential.

Furthermore

, railways are able to reduce the cost of maintenance of transport. It could be estimated to many people

willing

Add a missing verb

are willing

show examples

to use it. because the profits of that are more than disadvantages which could bring benefit much more than roads. It is clear that governments are likely to spend their money on railways which is more logical. To sum up, it could not deny that, authorities must invest in the

railway

. Not only investment in the

railway

has more profit but

also

they will have prevented environmental degradation.