It is argued that animal extinction is a natural process, so humans have no justifiable reason to avert it. I disagree with
this
notion.
Admittedly, the disappearance of certain animals Linking Words
such
as dinosaurs and dodos is considered natural because it occurs without direct human influence, like asteroid impact or volcanic eruptions, so it cannot be prevented. Linking Words
However
, I am convinced that it remains our responsibility to prevent Linking Words
this
phenomenon from happening. Specifically, there is no denying that human activities, Linking Words
such
as deforestation and industrial pollution, have led to habitat loss and pollution, which are the primary reasons for animal extinction. Since humans are the drivers of ecological destruction, it is their duty to ensure animals’ existence. By doing so, we are not only fulfilling our moral duty toward nature, but we are Linking Words
also
helping create a planet full of diversity for future generations to appreciate.
Linking Words
In addition
, apart from fulfilling our ethical responsibility, I am sure that our efforts to halt animals’ death may open new avenues for scientific discoveries, which could bring immense benefits to mankind. Linking Words
For instance
, the Sumatran Orangutan, a highly endangered species today, is worth protecting. If we ignore them, we will not be able to utilize them when conducting scientific research involving evolution and genetics. When Linking Words
this
happens, understanding their close genetic relationship with humans Linking Words
as well as
the possibility of scientific breakthroughs like cloning or medical advancements will not be possible.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
I find it admissible that certain animals no longer exist Linking Words
due to
natural reasons, we must still recognize our ethical responsibility and animals’ potential contributions to scientific discovery, so we should exert more effort on protecting them than neglecting them.Linking Words
xiaoruoling7