Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views.
Opinions are divergent as to the resolution of pertinent environmental problems. While some exponents advocate that the key environmental
issues
must be addressed at
an international scale, others, Change preposition
on
however
, subscribe to the opinion that these issues
can be resolved more efficiently at a national level
. This
discourse will expatiate on both sides of the argument in the subsequent paragraphs.
On the one hand, a stratum of the society is convinced that certain environmental issues
are effectively handled globally because of the close collaboration between nations
. When these powerful nations
unite, it becomes more feasible to resolve key environmental concerns as they devise financial schemes which can foster research on sustainable environmental practices. For instance
, major environmental issues
like global warming and ozone depletion can only be resolved if these powerful nations
like the USA can collaborate and deduce sustainable plans which can curb the effect in a long run. Therefore
issues
of global concern like global warming can be mitigated by mutual collaborations between nations
.
On the other hand
, some people believe that it is more convenient and flexible for nations
to solve the environmental crisis
at a local level
. To elucidate further
, issues
of deforestation and air pollution can be effectively managed if stringent measures are enforced by the governing bodies of the state. For example
, in the northern region of Cameroon, issues
of desertification were addressed by certain environmental agencies by imposing the practices of afforestation. Moreover
, the indigenous people have undergone a series of training because of the need to resolve a crucial concern of drought which made agriculture quite arduous. Hence
, collaboration with the locals appears a logical solution to combat the climate crisis
at a national level
.
In conclusion, this
essay has discussed global crisis
like global warming which can be deciphered by mutual collaboration with other affluent Fix the agreement mistake
crises
nations
that can offer valuable assistance in the areas of research. However
, it has equally portrayed how the law enforcement body of a state can collaborate with citizens to solve the crisis
of climate change at a national level
.Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.